[BlueOnyx:02795] Re: DFix note
Greg Kuhnert
greg.kuhnert at theanchoragesylvania.com
Tue Nov 3 04:06:33 -05 2009
Gerald Waugh wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 21:05 -0500, Darrell D. Mobley wrote:
>
>> For those people using DFix, and have IP’s whitelisted
>> in /etc/hosts.allow, you should know that DFix throws away hosts.allow
>> entries that have comments after the entry.
>>
>
> Comments in the /etc/hosts.allow are very similar to shell scripts where
> each comment line starts with a hash mark (#) and extends to the end of
> the line. There is one significant difference in how comments are
> handled in hosts.allow and shell scripts is that comments are not
> allowed after a rule. The following example shows valid uses of comments
> in the file.
>
> # this is a valid comment
> portmap : 1.2.3.4 : deny
> # so is this
>
> sshd : 9.8.7.6 : deny # but not this one
>
Hi All.
I have done a few tweaks in the source that will make it a little more
forgiving to the formatting in hosts.allow. I wont bother releasing this
just yet - its only a small tweak. It will be included in the next
release (whenever that may be).
Regards,
Greg.
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| / \ Greg Kuhnert, gkuhnert at compassnetworks.com.au |
| < o > Compass Networks - Pointing you in the right direction |
| \ / Come see us for BlueQuartz / BlueOnyx modules & Support. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Blueonyx
mailing list