[BlueOnyx:12707] Re: Proposed changes to BlueOnyx DNS (important!)

Richard Morgan richard at morgan-web.co.uk
Mon Apr 1 04:11:23 -05 2013


Thanks for sinking your teeth into this one... I like your solution - it's 
well thought out and considered many implications.  Recently, I've seen 
quite a load on the server recently and can't seem to crack it by iptables 
alone, so this is most welcome.

Option 'a' seems to me to be the way forward.  I'm sure the 'BlueOnyx News' 
on log in can be used to highlight 'DNS changes have been made by YUM; check 
your settings in Network Services' or something similar... this might help 
the non-list subscribers find config changes (if you're a list subscriber 
you'll hardly have missed this topic :o) ).

Cheers, Richard


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Stauber" <mstauber at blueonyx.it>
To: <blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 4:46 AM
Subject: [BlueOnyx:12701] Proposed changes to BlueOnyx DNS (important!)


> Hi all,
>
> I looked at ways to counter the DNS ANY? attacks natively in BlueOnyx.
>
> My work at that has progressed to a point where I need maybe another
> hour to wrap it up and release it. But there are implications, so I'd
> like to ask the list what you think about the changes that are in the 
> works.
>
> - BlueOnyx 5107R, 5108R: Fully patched both use bind-9.8.2-0.17.rc1,
> which has the experimental rate-limit patch in it. Which counters some
> of the fallout of the ongoing DNS DDoS attacks. If there are too many
> queries from a given source and you have rate-limits enabled, then the
> offending host will be temporarily banned. At the moment BlueOnyx has no
> provisions for rate-limiting in named.conf
>
> - BlueOnyx 5106R: The Bind on it is much older and doesn't have
> rate-limiting capability yet.
>
> I managed to recompile the bind-9.8.2-0.17.rc1 for 5106R. So it's
> possible to release this much newer version through the BlueOnyx YUM
> repositories. BUT: This also means that whenever a new bind comes out
> for RHEL6 clones, I need to take that one and recompile it as well for
> 5106R and need to release it through the BlueOnyx YUM repository. I
> don't like that prospect much, but it's an option.
>
> Additionally I reworked the "Advanced" tab in DNS management.
>
> A new layout has been suggested here on the list, but the old GUI
> doesn't allow me that flexibility. So what I have now in the making is 
> this:
>
>
> Allow DNS Query Access [x]
> Allow Queries from Everyone [x]
>  -------------------------------
> Allow Queries | 127.0.0.1/32 |
> from these | |
> Networks: | |
> -------------------------------
>
> Allow DNS Cache Access [x]
> Open DNS Server (Not recommended!) [ ]
>  -------------------------------
> Allow Cache | 127.0.0.1/32 |
> access from | |
> these Networks: | |
> -------------------------------
>
>  -------------------------------
> Forwarding | |
> Servers: | |
> | |
> -------------------------------
>
>  -------------------------------
> Zone Transfer | |
> access by IP | |
> Address: | |
> -------------------------------
>
> Rate Limits Enabled: [x]
> Responses per Second: 5
> Window: 5
>
> The settings shown above are my proposed defaults.
>
> Some extra explanations: The checkboxes "Allow Queries from Everyone"
> and "Open DNS Server (Not recommended!)" will add "0.0.0.0/0" to the
> addresses in the large input text boxes if they are ticked. I have to
> handle this differently, because the GUI thinks 0.0.0.0/0 is not a valid
> network address range and I'm unable to fix the broken regular
> expression that's currently in place there.
>
> The problem:
> ============
>
> The above default settings will create the following options{} section
> in /etc/named.conf:
>
> options {
>  directory "/var/named";
>  // spoof version for a little more security via obscurity
>  version "100.100.100";
>  // no forwarders defined
>  // zone transfer access denied
>  allow-transfer { none; };
>  allow-query { 0.0.0.0/0; 127.0.0.1/32; };
>  allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32; };
>  // recursion allowed
>  rate-limit { responses-per-second 5; window 5;};
>
> };
>
> When I push this update out as it is, then all enabled DNS servers on
> BlueOnyx 5106R, 5107R and 5108R will inherit these settings.
>
> Forwarders and zone transfer will not be modified. That info stays as it
> is. But query access gets allowed for everyone and recursion is only
> allowed from localhost. Additionally rate-limits are turned on.
>
> You see the problem: If you are currently running an open DNS server (by
> accident, intent or imagined necessity), then this might throw a wrench
> into your setup.
>
> If your BlueOnyx uses it's own DNS server as resolver, it can still
> query for domains that it's not authoritative for and will get a valid
> answer. But any other box that uses your BlueOnyx as a resolver will not
> be able to query anything but the domains you have zones for. Unless you
> go in and add the IP addresses or address ranges of those allowed
> servers into the "Allow Cache access from these Networks" input field
> and save the changes.
>
> Now please note: The "rate-limits" are *really* nice to have. But
> enabling them doesn't entirely solve the problem. So just turning those
> on and leaving the DNS server entirely open isn't a great idea.
>
>
> So what do you suggest?
> =======================
>
> a.) Do we bite into the sour apple and release this update that (for
> once) enforces a more secure DNS server setting (which can then be
> opened up as far as every admin desires)?
>
> IF we release this as I suggest, then some people will probably get
> upset when their DNS server no longer works as the open DDoS-attack-tool
> that it unwittingly might have become in the meantime.
>
> b.) Or do we go the safe and insecure route and only enforce ...
>
> allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32; };
>
> ... only on new installs and release it with ...
>
> allow-recursion { 0.0.0.0/0; };
>
> ... as it's now?
>
> Personally I tend to option (a) and want it locked own and damn the
> consequences. But I'm willing to listen to reason. :-)
>
> So let me know your thoughts. Thanks!
>
> -- 
> With best regards
>
> Michael Stauber
> _______________________________________________
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx 




More information about the Blueonyx mailing list