[BlueOnyx:26313] Re: negative AV-Spam score
Juerg Sommer
jsommer at emailto.ch
Thu Jun 22 05:57:38 -05 2023
Hi Meaulnes
> I'm confronted with a peculiar situation: spam slips untagged thru
> with a *negative* score
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-61.5 required=5.0 tests=BITCOIN_DEADLINE,
> BITCOIN_MALF_HTML,BITCOIN_SPAM_07,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,
> DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX,FSL_BULK_SIG,HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE,HTML_MESSAGE,
> HackersBitcoinAddress,NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN,PDS_BTC_ID,PYZOR_CHECK,
> RATS_NOPTR,RATWARE_NO_RDNS,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,RCVD_IN_XBL,
> RDNS_NONE,SBLXBL_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX,TXREP,
> T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
> autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
> X-Spam-Relay-Country: TN
>
> what's wrong here? I set the Required Reject Hits to 9 instead of 10
> and that mail shouldn't have appeared at all if the score had been
> 61.5, but positive! How does it turn negative?
That's normal. SpamAssasin gives positive and negative points based on
rules. There are some rules that indicates harmless mails (ex. BAYES
score 1-10%), in your case USER_IN_WELCOMELIST and USER_IN_WHITELIST.
And some other rules, hat indicates spam like BITCOIN_DEADLINE. If the
sum of all affected rules is greater than the defined score, the mail is
marked as spam.
I don't know/use the BlueOnyx plugin for spam scanning. Perhaps you can
define your Welcome-List Addresses in the gui and should check if this
sender address is whitelisted. There's maybe a missconfiguration, but
negative points are not generally a problem.
BTW: SpamAssassin has changed their wording (like many other companies).
Whitelist is now welcomelist, blacklist is blocklist. So one of the
rules above would be an alias of the other and I don't know how it's
named in the GUI.
Best regards,
Juerg
More information about the Blueonyx
mailing list