[BlueOnyx:27437] Let's Encrypt email

[Cosmic Dancer]

Hi,

received an email today from Let's Encrypt about email notifications:

-- begin first part of email

Hi,

As a Let’s Encrypt Subscriber, you benefit from access to free, automated
TLS certificates. One way we have supported Subscribers is by sending
expiration notification emails when it’s time to renew a certificate.

We’re writing to inform you that we intend to discontinue sending
expiration notification emails. You can learn more in this blog post. You
will receive this reminder email again in the coming months:

https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/22/Ending-Expiration-Emails

-- end first part of email

But if my memory serves me right, renewal of the L.E. certificate(s) on
B.O. is automated.

Am I right?

Regards,

Arie



Op do 30 jan 2025 08:10 schreef Dirk Estenfeld via Blueonyx <
blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it>:

> Hello Chris,
>
> Many thanks for your reply.
>
> Yes, the smooth procedure under Ubuntu has also motivated me to address
> the issue again. In Ubuntu you can go from 16 to 24 with a few intermediate
> steps and the pain is really limited.
> I really like easy migrate, but when I switch from CentOS7 to AL 8 or 9, I
> have to go through all the sites because the directory structure of the
> webroot has changed. That is time-consuming. But unavoidable. In addition,
> there are always small kinks, such as the fact that all domains are simply
> entered in the /etc/opendkim/SigningTable list during a migration, even if
> they do not have a dkim. Sure, if you know about it, you can fix it
> afterwards. But it's just not a no-brainer.
>
> Perhaps it will be easier with easy migrate from AL 9 and BO 5211R to AL
> 10 and BO 5212R because the systems are closer together and the directory
> structure does not change. But also because everything remains the same, my
> approach was to ask again whether the inplace upgrade process has improved
> with AL in contrast to CentOS.
>
> Best regards
> Dirk
>
>
> blackpoint GmbH – Friedberger Straße 106b – 61118 Bad Vilbel
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Blueonyx <blueonyx-bounces at mail.blueonyx.it> Im Auftrag von Chris
> Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet via Blueonyx
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Januar 2025 21:24
> An: blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it
> Betreff: [BlueOnyx:27419] Re: 5210R/5211R YUM updates (CodeIgniter update)
>
> On 1/21/25 02:49, Dirk Estenfeld via Blueonyx wrote:
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I know that I've asked this several times and your answer in the past
> has always been - it doesn't make sense.
> > But now Blueonyx has its own PHP version and it is no longer CentOS, but
> Almalinux and the directory structure will probably not change again.
> > Do you see the chance of an inline upgrade without reinstallation and
> migration from Almalinux 9 to Almalinux 10 and Blueonx 5211R to 5212R this
> time?
>
> Hi Dirk!
>
> I do not pretend to speak for Michael but will offer some limited insight
> from my perspective.
>
> I have run the in-place upgrades on various operating systems. The
> smoothest ones tend to be Debian-based (Ubuntu has gone extremely well for
> me when I have done this.)   I have run Elevate on Enterprise Linux
> variants.  At a customer's behest, we ran Elevate to take a cPanel server
> from CentOS 7 to AlmaLinux 8 because that was suggested by a pop-up within
> cPanel for them. It went terribly.   Based on the experiences that I have
> had, I would NEVER suggest going this route on a production server.
>
> Even if it does go well, having to deal with the downtime for the various
> updates and restarts just does not seem to make a lot of sense.   And if
> something goes wrong on the transfer, you always have the old server to
> fall back on as the migration is non-destructive.   If something goes wrong
> in the in-place upgrade process, you may have an extended downtime while
> trying to recover.
>
> Given that Easy-Migrate works as well as it does, it's probably just
> faster to spin up a new server and run the migration.   This is the
> standard practice we follow with both BlueOnyx and WHM/cPanel servers that
> we manage.
>
> I certainly wouldn't say that it cannot be done.   I just question the
> logic of doing so.
>
> --
> Chris Gebhardt
> VIRTBIZ Internet Services
> Access, Web Hosting, Colocation, Dedicated www.virtbiz.com | toll-free
> (866) 4 VIRTBIZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.blueonyx.it/pipermail/blueonyx/attachments/20250203/8fbc5429/attachment.html>