<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 2/07/2010 7:24 AM, Tony C. Loosle wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:201071152430.479462@Tony-PCX" type="cite">
<meta name="Generator" content="PSI HTML/CSS Generator">
<style type="text/css"><!--
body{font-family:'Arial';font-size:10pt;font-color:'#000000';}
LI{display:list-item;margin:0.00in;}
p{display:block;margin:0.00in;}
--></style>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 10pt;">I have a
few servers running VMWare and also a license to Avent.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 10pt;">I want to
move 4 bx servers to a Virtual server. Which is better, Avent or
VMWare?</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 10pt;">any ideas
would be helpful.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi Tony.<br>
<br>
I'm an Aventurin{e} fan personally... for a few reasons:<br>
<blockquote>(1) Performance benefits by using a shared kernel... (less
memory footprint and kernel overhead per VPS)<br>
(2) I like the ability to "vzctl" enter a VPS from the master node.<br>
(3) Familiar B* gui...<br>
(4) Supporting B* developer type people...<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
All this assumes you dont need a windows virtual server of course.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Greg.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| / \ Greg Kuhnert, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gkuhnert@compassnetworks.com.au">gkuhnert@compassnetworks.com.au</a> |
| < o > Compass Networks - Pointing you in the right direction |
| \ / Come see us for BlueQuartz / BlueOnyx modules & Support. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
</pre>
</body>
</html>