[BlueOnyx:12894] Re: Server hardware

[Dave Park]

Which is whyI specified "static content"...

The other advantage of modern SSDs is that when they fail, they normally
fail into a fully recoverable read-only mode.

Dave


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Michael Stauber <mstauber at blueonyx.it>wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> > And/or putting static content on a couple of mirrored SSDs that have a
> > high IOPS capacity can really move things along.
>
> In theory a good idea. But on Linux I won't touch SSDs with a ten foot
> pole. At least I wouldn't store anything important on them.
>
> Granted, my experience with them was two years ago. However, it wasn't
> some junk, but the best large consumer SSDs that were available by then.
> However, they burned out within days while plugged into a RAID card in
> an SSD only environment that was powering a large MySQL server. With
> large I mean pretty damn large. :o)
>
> SSDs are only good for so and so many write cycles. On Windows the SSD
> makers cheat with drivers that bundle write requests to slow down the
> wear and tear. On Linux they can't do that.
>
> Then with the swap partition and some other heavy duty partition on an
> SSD things went pretty interesting real quick.
>
> --
> With best regards
>
> Michael Stauber
> _______________________________________________
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx at mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
>



-- 

 "At present, not all the possibilities implied by the above are
implemented."


    -- Tony Firshman, 1999
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.blueonyx.it/pipermail/blueonyx/attachments/20130419/253b2873/attachment.html>